JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 22, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Ugpp

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto no se incurrió en ninguna de las causales invocadas
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-371/16.

La UGPP pidió a la Corporación anular la providencia de la referencia, por considerar que vulnera su derecho al debido proceso.

Fundamenta el incidente en el cambio de la jurisprudencia de la Sala Plena la Corporación y la jurisprudencia en vigor de las Salas de Revisión.

Igualmente, en la omisión de estudio de asuntos con relevancia constitucional, trascendentales para el sentido de la decisión.

La Sala Plena decide NEGAR la nulidad invocada, por no configurarse las causales alegadas.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Negar la solicitud de nulidad interpuesta por la Unidad Administrativa Especial de Gestion Pensional y Contribuciones Parafiscales de la Proteccion Social - UGPP contra la sentencia T-371 de 2016.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia a la Unidad Administrativa Especial de Gestion Pensional y Contribuciones Parafiscales de la Proteccion Social - UGPP, con la advertencia de que contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
ConcurrenceMaría Victoria Calle CorreaPartial dissentLuis Guillermo Guerrero PérezConcurrenceAlejandro Linares Cantillo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.